RIP IRS?
Most Americans see the IRS and paying taxes as a necessary burden of living in society; most but not all.
Ron Paul, the libertarian candidate for the Republican presidential nomination, has garnered a lot of attention lately. His primary claim to fame has been his firm stance against the increasingly unpopular US occupation of Iraq. While this position has brought him support from voters of all political stripes it is some of his other positions that many find rather jarring.
One of these is his firm belief that the US government has no need for and should do away with the IRS. In an age when no working Americans can remember not paying an income tax to the IRS this can seem startling and a little exciting. Paul’s position, as laid out at his website RonPaul2008.com, is that every working American should bring home 100% of what they earned.
There’s a seductive quality to his position. During the first one hundred plus years of the Union, Americans paid no income tax to the Federal government. To varying degrees most of the US treasury came from tariffs. It worked then, Paul argues, and it can work again.
But a deeper look at this proposal reveals problems from many perspectives - political, economic, business, international relations, etc. Over the coming weeks, I’ll take a closer look at the potential impact of shuttering the IRS.
Labels: income tax, irs, ron paul


1 Comments:
I would imagine the transition to no IRS would impact the US negatively at first. Ron Paul says that if we roll the country's spending back to year 2000 levels that we could lose the IRS and come out even. According to him, the income tax only takes in 1/3 of the US gross income--the other 2/3 's are made with tarrifs, excise taxes, etc. So at first we would have to do some serious cutting of the country's spending (which we need to do anyway to avoid bankruptcy).
Then we'd see a huge boom in the economy.
And heck even if we didn't, the point of the income tax is completely wrong headed--that is that the government controls what you get to keep and what you don't. The money you make is your personal property. The government cannot constitutionally deprive you of your property. Period.
September 30, 2007 9:44 AM
Post a Comment
<< Home